Mold Testing: Modern Strategies (Part 3)
When it comes to choosing the right mold sampling method, it’s crucial to consider various factors
When it comes to choosing the right mold sampling method, it’s crucial to consider various factors
Septic systems are common in rural Montana. But, it’s not uncommon for a new homebuyer to be learning about how to properly maintain a septic system for the first time. Like most home systems, special considerations and configurations must be made depending on the natural surrounding environment. Septic systems are no different. A high water table or poor soil conditions pose challenges for traditional septic systems and can lead to potential issues of contaminated ground/well water. Let’s take a closer look at the type of system we might see to match such conditions.
Above ground septic systems, also known as “mound systems,” are a type of septic system that is commonly used in areas with high water tables or poor soil conditions. These systems are designed to handle the excess wastewater from a septic tank and disperse it into the surrounding soil in a way that does not contaminate the groundwater.
Unlike traditional septic systems, which rely on underground perforated pipes to disperse the wastewater, above ground septic drain fields utilize a raised bed of gravel or crushed stone. This bed is usually several feet above the natural grade of the land, and is typically covered with a layer of soil to promote the growth of vegetation.
The main advantage of above ground septic drain fields is that they are less likely to be affected by high water tables or poor soil conditions. In areas with a high water table, traditional septic systems can be prone to failure as the wastewater can saturate the soil and escape into the groundwater. Above ground systems, on the other hand, are less likely to fail as the wastewater is distributed over a larger surface area and the excess is safely discharged above the water table.
Another advantage of above ground septic drain fields is that they are typically easier to maintain. The gravel or crushed stone bed allows for easy access to the system for inspections and repairs, and the vegetation that grows on the soil cover helps to keep the system functioning properly by breaking down organic matter.
There are many different types of home siding materials to choose from, each with their own unique set of pros and cons. In a Montana climate, where temperatures can vary greatly, it is important to consider the durability, energy efficiency, maintenance requirements, and life expectancy of each option. It is essential to choose a siding material that can withstand the state’s extreme weather conditions. Here are some common types of home siding materials and their characteristics:
Vinyl siding: Vinyl siding is a good choice for some homeowners because it is a low maintenance and cost-effective option. However, in extreme cold temperatures it may be more prone to cracking compared to other options. Vinyl siding is also easily damaged by accidental impacts and has a tendency to fade over time with UV exposure.
Energy Efficiency Score: “Medium Efficiency”
Wood siding: One of the main benefits of wood siding is its natural aesthetic, it can give a warm and rustic look to the house. However, wood siding requires regular maintenance, including painting or staining to protect it from the elements, and to prevent rot, warping, and insect infestation. This can be a significant undertaking, especially in a state like Montana where the weather can be harsh and the temperature fluctuates.
Energy Efficiency Score: “Medium Efficiency”
Engineered Wood Siding: In comparison to true wood siding, engineered wood is more stable. It is made from wood fibers that are bound together with resin, which makes it more resistant to warping, cracking, and shrinking. This means that it is more able to withstand the temperature fluctuations, freeze-thaw cycles, and moisture that occur in Montana’s climate. It is also more eco-friendly than traditional wood siding. It is often made from recycled wood fibers, which reduces the demand for virgin wood. Additionally, it requires less maintenance than traditional wood siding, and it can be painted or stained to match any color or architectural style of your home.
Energy Efficiency Score: “High Efficiency”
Stucco siding: Stucco siding is less common in Montana, as is likely not be the best option for Montana’s climate. Stucco is a type of exterior finish that is made from a mixture of cement, sand, and water. While it is durable and can be customized to match a variety of architectural styles, it can be sensitive to temperature changes, which can lead to cracking in cold weather. The cracking can be further exacerbated by the freeze-thaw cycle that occurs in the state. When water gets into the cracks, it can freeze and expand when the temperature drops, which can make the cracks larger.
Energy Efficiency Score: “Low Efficiency”
Fiber Cement Siding: Fiber cement siding is made from a mixture of cement, sand, and cellulose fibers. Fiber cement siding is more resistant to the effects of temperature changes and can withstand the freeze-thaw cycles that occur in Montana. Additionally, fiber cement siding is also resistant to moisture, which is an important factor in a state like Montana where the weather can be damp and moist. It is also more fire-resistant than other siding options, which can be a benefit for homeowners in areas that are prone to wildfires.
Energy Efficiency Score: “High Efficiency”
In conclusion, when choosing a siding material for a Montana home, it is important to consider the durability, energy efficiency, and maintenance requirements of each option. Fiber cement siding may be the best choice due to its durability and resistance to extreme temperatures. However, it is important to consider the budget and personal preferences of the homeowner before making a decision. You also want to ensure the contractor installing the siding material is qualified/experienced with that particular material.
Inspect Montana serves clients across Montana including Lolo, Missoula, Hamilton, Corvallis, Florence, Victor, Darby, Alberton, Polson, Ronan, St. Regis, Clinton, Stevensville, Philipsburg, Drummond, Frenchtown, St.Ignatius, Garrison, Lincoln, Sula, Pablo, Deer Lodge, Bitterroot Valley and throughout Western Montana.
Consult Montana Home Inspectors
Experience the Inspect Montana Difference.